Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • I would generally agree with using a normal single drive for most home systems. However this is a software development system and I like the added safety of a raid setup. I do have proper backups kept in a fireproof safe as well.
    – user10762
    Commented Oct 8, 2009 at 3:09
  • @davpen: RAID doesn't provide safety, it provides performance and/or redundancy. If you want safety you're better off in a software-RAID mirroring configuration than a RAID-5 setup. Commented Oct 18, 2009 at 21:07
  • By safety I mean redundancy as in some protection from a drive failure. Software RAID mirroring (RAID 1) is not any better than RAID 5 (software or hardware) in providing protection against a drive failure. Of course using a RAID array is not a substitute for regular backups it is just an added layer of protection.
    – user10762
    Commented Oct 19, 2009 at 7:15