Timeline for Is there a modern browser that runs on Windows 3.1?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2012 at 12:49 | comment | added | o0'. | 0: The only correct answer to this question, in this context, is DON'T. This answer might have been ok in another context, of course. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 16:33 | comment | added | Chad Harrison | No, they operate independently. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 16:21 | comment | added | horatio | Does it act as an interlock (or similar) where the saw cannot be operated without punching in a job number etc.? | |
| May 11, 2012 at 15:13 | comment | added | Chad Harrison | @horatio You are correct about the billing reasons. The time clock software has alot of project management features that allows you to allocate time and material to specific projects which helps track actual costs. It's looking like another "device" will be needed at the saw. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 14:17 | comment | added | horatio | I was wondering if the timeclock needed to be on the same computer for journaling or billing reasons (for operating the saw), or if it was just there as a convenience. If it not required for the equipment, move the feature to a different piece of hardware. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 13:08 | comment | added | Chad Harrison | Thanks for an actual answer. Once things slow down a bit, I'll give this a shot! If all looks well, I'll set this to the answer. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 11:36 | comment | added | Ramhound | This seems like the best solution. Just place two computers in the same area. Solves the problem of allowing a Windows 3.1 access to the internet, and solve the use of an unsafe browser ( anything that runs on 3.1 would be unsafe ). | |
| May 10, 2012 at 22:01 | history | edited | Gurken Papst | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammar
|
| May 10, 2012 at 21:42 | history | answered | Gurken Papst | CC BY-SA 3.0 |