Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 2
    This seems like the best solution. Just place two computers in the same area. Solves the problem of allowing a Windows 3.1 access to the internet, and solve the use of an unsafe browser ( anything that runs on 3.1 would be unsafe ).
    – Ramhound
    Commented May 11, 2012 at 11:36
  • 3
    Thanks for an actual answer. Once things slow down a bit, I'll give this a shot! If all looks well, I'll set this to the answer. Commented May 11, 2012 at 13:08
  • 4
    I was wondering if the timeclock needed to be on the same computer for journaling or billing reasons (for operating the saw), or if it was just there as a convenience. If it not required for the equipment, move the feature to a different piece of hardware.
    – horatio
    Commented May 11, 2012 at 14:17
  • 1
    @horatio You are correct about the billing reasons. The time clock software has alot of project management features that allows you to allocate time and material to specific projects which helps track actual costs. It's looking like another "device" will be needed at the saw. Commented May 11, 2012 at 15:13
  • 2
    0: The only correct answer to this question, in this context, is DON'T. This answer might have been ok in another context, of course.
    – o0'.
    Commented May 13, 2012 at 12:49