Timeline for How to extract clear voice from a noisy audio file?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 4 at 0:00 | history | edited | zx485 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reverted to original to remove malware --- re-changed wikipedia entry.
|
| S Mar 4 at 0:00 | history | suggested | Mobigital | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reverted to original to remove malware
|
| Mar 3 at 23:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 4 at 0:00 | |||||
| S Aug 21, 2021 at 5:56 | history | suggested | Nathan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed links
|
| Aug 20, 2021 at 20:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 21, 2021 at 5:56 | |||||
| Nov 28, 2020 at 23:03 | comment | added | Sergey Efimov | @chx does not sound fits in low-high filters? | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 18:07 | comment | added | chx | A generic noise removal program manipulating the sound will never ever reach the human brain understanding speech. It's not your ear, it's the brain using the redundancy of the human language, the likely context of the speech and so on. Try to understand random words in a made up language on a noisy track. | |
| Feb 5, 2012 at 17:29 | comment | added | Juhele | just a short comment. Sometimes the recording is so bad, that it is almost impossible to extract the voice. And human ear is much more capable to filter out the voice, than any SW. I tried Audacity for some school lessons recordings and in many cases got only terribly sounding distorted voice like from cheap chinese radio in metal barrel - in fact not much better, than the source file. | |
| Feb 4, 2012 at 15:44 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 199 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2012 at 15:39 | history | answered | chx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |