Skip to main content
The 2024 Developer Survey results are live! See the results

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    While this is a very interesting virus, and it's implications were very large, I would argue that Stuxnet is not what @MaxMackie was looking for. In that case, the software had physical control of a physical device capable of causing harm. I think he is talking about just a basic computer system causing harm to itself, not any devices which it has direct control over. That being said, the Stuxnet virus was damn amazing at what it did - +1. Commented Jul 22, 2011 at 17:10
  • 1
    I kept chortling and shaking my head as I read that article. I know it's not what he was asking, but apparently I wasn't the only person who thought it at least had theoretical relations with this topic. Commented Jul 22, 2011 at 17:24