Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 18
    I really want my motherboard to support 65TiB of RAM :(
    – Flimzy
    Commented Jul 8, 2011 at 22:54
  • +1 for mentioning that address lines are different from a processor's architecture. On that note, it would be easier for a memory extension on a 32-bit processor to just "double up" and go to a full 64-bit (requiring double the space for pointers). Great answer. Commented Jul 9, 2011 at 0:58
  • 1
    I want my entire PC on one chip, completely solid state, only ports to connect external devices and a power cord. I only hope I live long enough to see it.
    – Moab
    Commented Jul 9, 2011 at 2:44
  • 6
    @Moab: Already exists. It's called System-on-a-chip. Some even run desktop OSes like Linux. (OK, most use some external chips, e.g. RAM, but they're close)...
    – sleske
    Commented Jul 21, 2011 at 11:09
  • 3
    Don't forget that each memory slot has a limited number of memory address lines going to it as well. This means that each slot will have its own maximum. Nearly always each slots' maximum is the same as the others. The only exception to that rule I've seen was a motherboard that could use DDR2 and DDR3 memory (but not at the same time). So you may have a system with 4 slots that supports up to 8GB of RAM, but no slot can take more than a 2GB stick as each slot is only given 31 address lines plus some system to activate that particular slot. Bits 32-33 just control which RAM stick is active. Commented Aug 16, 2014 at 7:19