Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 3, 2020 at 10:59 comment added T.Todua cd /d "D:\path"
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:17 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Jul 23, 2011 at 20:00 history edited CommunityBot
insert duplicate link
Jul 23, 2011 at 20:00 history closed nhinkle exact duplicate
Jun 28, 2011 at 0:45 comment added Synetech It’s not surprising or ironic, it’s because Windows and DOS have completely different interfaces. Yes every process (even in DOS) gets a single item in response to a GWD command, but otherwise Windows and DOS function very differently. You can’t printf from a non-console Windows program either. ;-)
Jun 27, 2011 at 13:28 comment added HalloDu It is indeed true, that there are (even if emulated) multiple current directories. For further information read this nice article blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2010/10/11/10073890.aspx by Raymond Chen
Jun 27, 2011 at 10:48 comment added JdeBP The irony, Phoshi, is that in Windows NT, including Windows NT version 6.1 as in the question, that is not the case for the operating system proper. There's only one current directory for a process. The old MS/PC/DR-DOS semantics of separately maintained working directories for each drive are emulated (but not exactly) via a system of hidden environment variables.
Jun 26, 2011 at 22:07 comment added Phoshi While the question has been answered, a neat upshot of this is that different drives maintain different working directories - and you can refer to them by the drive letter! copy aFile e: will copy aFile to e:'s working directory, for example.
Jun 26, 2011 at 19:36 vote accept Shishant
Jun 26, 2011 at 19:04 answer added Greg timeline score: 188
Jun 26, 2011 at 19:04 answer added Synetech timeline score: 67
Jun 26, 2011 at 19:00 history asked Shishant CC BY-SA 3.0