Timeline for Bridged vs. NAT: a Virtualbox and VMWare Comparison
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 2, 2022 at 15:00 | history | edited | Joel Coehoorn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Jun 20, 2011 at 18:24 | comment | added | David Spillett | The whole range is 172.16.0.0/12, but it is normally considered to be a block 16 /16s (172.16.0.0/16, 172.17.0.0/16, ..., 172.31.0.0/16) rather than one /12 in the same way 192.168.0.0/16 is usually considered to be 256 /24s and not one /16. | |
Jun 20, 2011 at 17:15 | vote | accept | Brent Arias | ||
Jun 20, 2011 at 17:00 | comment | added | sinni800 | it's 172.16.0.0/16 because 16 to 32 are all their own subnetwork normally. So theres 16 nets in total in this range... I know what you mean, but I thought a little differently about it when you first said it. Subnetting it more than once makes sense :) | |
Jun 20, 2011 at 16:56 | comment | added | Joel Coehoorn | @sinni - no, it is 172.16.0.0/12, as 172.31.255.255 marks the end of the range. /16 would end at 172.16.255.255. And I work on a larger network where it's convenient to assign pools for certain classes - so all printers are in 10.x.15.0, for example. All clients in one department are 10.2.0.0, another 10.3.0.0. The first department's printers are 10.2.15.0-10.2.15.255, the 2nd department's are 10.3.15.0. to 10.3.15.255. I'll never use all the addresses, but it's nice to have more blocks to assign out. | |
Jun 20, 2011 at 16:52 | comment | added | sinni800 | It's 172.16.0.0/16 :-). Also why 10.0.0.0 addresses because "there are more addresses available"? Do you think you'll ever reach the amount? | |
Jun 20, 2011 at 16:50 | history | answered | Joel Coehoorn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |