Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1. The power isn't mentioned anywhere in the question. 2. Same thing could happen to USB 2.0 devices, because one port can't power whole hub. 3. You can't assume that a device will decrease it's transfer speed because of low power condition. It may refuse to work at all or it may attempt to save power in some other way.
    – AndrejaKo
    Commented May 6, 2011 at 7:29
  • @AndrejaKo 1. It isn't, but it figures in. 2. It does happen with USBv2. And we do see reduced (v1.1) speeds when using via a hub. 3. I did say 'might not work or might work in a low power mode' Commented May 6, 2011 at 7:30
  • 1
    The wikipedia page doesn't say anything about the issue (I checked there beforehand). I know that USB 3 has more than enough theoretical capacity, the question is how USB2-over-USB3 is implemented.
    – Martin
    Commented May 9, 2011 at 13:38
  • 1
    It's unfortunate that the design provides no way for a USB 3.0 hub to reroute USB 2.0 traffic over the SuperSpeed bus. Commented Aug 26, 2011 at 6:57