Timeline for Windows 7 using exactly HALF the installed memory
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2010 at 11:29 | comment | added | Nathan Ridley | Thought I should follow up on this. I went 64 bit a month or so after posting this question and never looked back. Not one compatibility problem I was afraid of ever showed its head. I can't imagine why anyone would still go 32 bit anymore. | |
| Aug 18, 2009 at 11:07 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | bottom line: it's not worth the brain damage. go 64-bit. There's almost no reason not to, these days. | |
| Aug 18, 2009 at 10:07 | comment | added | Nathan Ridley | Yeah I'm aware of the addressing thing; the thing that threw me was the fact that I'm on less than the normal 2.5-3gb ram one would expect and that the amount available is EXACTLY half the full amount. | |
| Aug 18, 2009 at 10:04 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |