Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 6 at 2:30 history edited Giacomo1968 CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixing reference.
Jun 5 at 9:39 vote accept Alfrodo8
Jun 4 at 22:02 comment added JayCravens @Kissaki The output was nearly half of the source: 4843 kb/s compared to 8122 kb/s. The AAC also says 6 channel, so -c:a copy seemed safe.
Jun 4 at 21:41 comment added Kissaki I don't think -c:v h264 is necessary because ffmpeg will default to h264 when targeting mp4. As per OP edit, the source is h264 too, so ffmpeg will take that over too.
Jun 4 at 21:40 comment added Kissaki What do you mean by "at least to get the bitrate back up"? To my knowledge, ffmpeg has defaults, and h264 will use an adequate compression for good image quality. Unless it's not enough and OP specifically wants higher quality at the cost of time and size I would not specify the bitrate [and to almost double].
Jun 4 at 21:37 comment added Kissaki Why do you suggest copying audio in eac3 format into mp4 but not h264? AAC is the usual, commonplace audio codec for mp4. E-AC-3 is at least not listed on Wikipedia at all. If suggesting copy I would only suggest it for video, which is already h264.
Jun 4 at 21:10 history edited JayCravens CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Jun 4 at 21:04 history edited JayCravens CC BY-SA 4.0
-c copy
Jun 4 at 20:51 comment added JayCravens @DanielB That's a good call. -c copy should switch containers, no problem.
Jun 4 at 20:48 comment added Daniel B Actually, re-encoding the video should not be necessary at all.
Jun 4 at 20:39 history answered JayCravens CC BY-SA 4.0