Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 27
    More suitable for retrocomputing.stackexchange.com
    – AlexD
    Commented Feb 25 at 8:21
  • DOS started with FAT12 and a maximum partition size of 16 MB., although I can't say that was the reason.
    – tdelaney
    Commented Feb 25 at 16:33
  • 2
    Logical partitions has been a thing IBM has supported for decades with their mainframes, specifically, with MVS from 1974.
    – Ramhound
    Commented Feb 25 at 18:34
  • 1
    If you are doing research on the history of file systems why are you asking questions about the MBR? If you consider storage as a layered system with partition tables, file systems and files you are not operating on the right level.
    – r2d3
    Commented Feb 26 at 9:16
  • 1
    @Ramhound On mainframes and large servers, "logical partitioning" can refer to partitioning not just the storage, but the entire server: for example, you might be able to split a 8-CPU server logically into two 4-CPU servers that will be able to run entirely separate operating systems in parallel. But this question seems to be about storage partitioning specifically.
    – telcoM
    Commented Feb 26 at 10:35