Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • I'm not talking about generic RAID. I'm talking specifically about mdadm, where there are two sources (the one in my question as well as neil.brown.name/blog/20090817000931 saying that specifically this is possible). I'll gladly accept your answer if you can provide a definitive source disproving my two sources.
    – Sixtyfive
    Commented Jun 16, 2021 at 16:04
  • @Sixtyfive Your source specifically mentions REDUCING the number of devices in an existing array. Not creating a new array already reduced...Although I only mention this after a quick scan of your source and am not any sort of authority on disk arrays. EDIT: Also mentions that the feature is not working on RAID 5 and might be working somewhere some sunny day
    – mishan
    Commented Jun 16, 2021 at 16:09
  • 1
    I'm guessing the result of that 2-disk conversion would be a "degraded" RAID5 array (i.e. the same as if a normal RAID5 had lost a disk), which then needs to be brought back to normal by adding the 3rd (parity) disk. Commented Jun 16, 2021 at 16:09
  • thank you, added the word "degraded" to my question to indicate that i'm aware of this not being "proper".
    – Sixtyfive
    Commented Jun 16, 2021 at 16:12