Timeline for Is Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) a measure of life expectancy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 18, 2019 at 0:20 | vote | accept | karanza | ||
Aug 17, 2019 at 21:34 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor cleanup
|
Aug 17, 2019 at 8:43 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Close voters: this has attracted a number of close votes based on the question being unclear or opinion based. It is neither. This is completely and factually answerable. It is asking about the nature of MTBF and whether it can reliably be used to predict life expectancy. It isn't asking people to predict how long the OP's parts will last. Please read the question carefully and if you think it has issues, identify them and we can fix them. | |
Aug 17, 2019 at 4:43 | history | edited | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved title, minor cleanup, removed fluff
|
Aug 17, 2019 at 4:11 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 17, 2019 at 1:29 | answer | added | Mr Ethernet | timeline score: 2 | |
Aug 17, 2019 at 0:50 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 29, 2019 at 11:01 | |||||
Aug 17, 2019 at 0:38 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | You seem to misunderstand what MTBF is. It's the mean time (average) between failures. As a number, it only indicates the average life expectancy of the device, but in reality said device could last 1 hour, or many hours longer than the MTBF. | |
Aug 17, 2019 at 0:26 | history | asked | karanza | CC BY-SA 4.0 |