Skip to main content
The 2024 Developer Survey results are live! See the results
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 12, 2020 at 13:48 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
May 12, 2019 at 3:55 comment added Ben Voigt @DavidWhite: As the answer explained, it's not a matter of precedence. Failure to match an "allow" rule does not mean instant denial -- the firewall keeps evaluating rules all the way down the list until one matches.
May 12, 2019 at 3:49 history edited Appleoddity CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
May 12, 2019 at 3:31 vote accept David White
May 12, 2019 at 3:31 comment added David White Thanks, Appleoddity, that was it. UltraVNC had unexpectedly installed two different firewall rules. The "vnc5900" one was already in place, and I had hoped by modifying it to allow only certain IPs I could tighten up the rule and limit access. But it had also installed a "WinVNC" rule which was application based (winvnc.exe) rather than port based, and apparently that rule tool precedence over the "vnc5900" rule, causing my IP restrictions on that rule to have no effect. Consolidating the two rules into one now has the firewall working as expected.
May 12, 2019 at 2:12 history answered Appleoddity CC BY-SA 4.0