Skip to main content
The 2024 Developer Survey results are live! See the results

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • Thanks, Appleoddity, that was it. UltraVNC had unexpectedly installed two different firewall rules. The "vnc5900" one was already in place, and I had hoped by modifying it to allow only certain IPs I could tighten up the rule and limit access. But it had also installed a "WinVNC" rule which was application based (winvnc.exe) rather than port based, and apparently that rule tool precedence over the "vnc5900" rule, causing my IP restrictions on that rule to have no effect. Consolidating the two rules into one now has the firewall working as expected. Commented May 12, 2019 at 3:31
  • @DavidWhite: As the answer explained, it's not a matter of precedence. Failure to match an "allow" rule does not mean instant denial -- the firewall keeps evaluating rules all the way down the list until one matches.
    – Ben Voigt
    Commented May 12, 2019 at 3:55