Timeline for Can a freely available add-in to a proprietary softare be considered open source? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2018 at 6:20 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Aug 8, 2018 at 8:10 | |||||
| Aug 8, 2018 at 6:00 | history | edited | Samuel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:49 | comment | added | Ramhound | The question is about if a library written in a specific language can be considered open source if it has a certain license applied to it. The close reason simply indicates that not every question about software is within scope. I selected that particular close reason since you are going to get a lot of opinions on the matter. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 15:38 | comment | added | Samuel | How is this question not about software? The question concerns a software add-in, is that not within the scope of this site? | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 9:41 | history | closed |
fixer1234 Thomas Dickey Ramhound n8te bertieb |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Aug 5, 2018 at 23:18 | comment | added | Ramhound | .NET Core is open source, furthermore, the add-on is still open source | |
| Aug 5, 2018 at 22:55 | vote | accept | Samuel | ||
| Aug 5, 2018 at 21:54 | answer | added | AdamKalisz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 5, 2018 at 21:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 6, 2018 at 9:41 | |||||
| Aug 5, 2018 at 21:33 | answer | added | Keltari | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 5, 2018 at 21:13 | answer | added | Attie | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 5, 2018 at 20:55 | history | asked | Samuel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |