Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • Your drives have a 1/10^14 read error rate according to specs, if you use the formula from serverfault.com/questions/591777/… that gives you a 21.9% chance of rebuild failure. For brand new working drives that is.
    – Sacha K
    Commented Feb 10, 2018 at 9:56
  • If you really want to try to recover your data you need to stop using and modifying these drives. So 30TB to backup the raw content of the drives and another 24TB where you will re-assemble the data.
    – Sacha K
    Commented Feb 10, 2018 at 10:04
  • So - in case of I recover my data - what modification to my raid would you suggest? Switch to RAID6?
    – swat
    Commented Feb 10, 2018 at 14:19
  • I wouldn't use RAID 5 or 6. Do the math, but if I'm not wrong you get a chance of rebuild failure of 16.9% with 5 drives in RAID 6 (so less usable space) and still 21.9% if you add a drive to make it 6 drives in RAID 6.
    – Sacha K
    Commented Feb 10, 2018 at 15:04