Skip to main content

Timeline for WD Red Pro vs Black vs Gold

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 21, 2018 at 9:52 history tweeted twitter.com/super_user/status/966249343287222274
Oct 31, 2017 at 11:05 comment added flolilo My experience with hard drives is quite diametral to yours: I have dozens of old & new well working Seagate drives, but all WDs I have (except 4 WD Red 3TB) die on me within a year. Of course, all of that is pointless as it is anecdotal evidence. Here's a nice chart from BackBlaze with some interesting statistics (Source).
Oct 31, 2017 at 6:40 history edited fixer1234
removed manufacturer meta tag
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:29 comment added Ramhound I will prepare an answer. I will not suggest anything though just outline the reliability of each product class.
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:25 review Close votes
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:35
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:22 comment added Ramhound Well it calls itself a controller. suppose processor had a broader definition then I place on it.
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:21 comment added Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams Hard drives have had processors for a while now. You're not going to implement the fancy parts of SATA with just glue logic.
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:19 comment added Ramhound MTBF on the gold is 2,500,000 hours vs 100,000 on Red Pro and undocumented with the black.
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:15 comment added davidgo For the fun of it I removed the controller circuit from an old WD blue drive, and it has a Marvel 88i9045 chip which I believe will be a processor.
Oct 30, 2017 at 23:07 comment added davidgo @Ramhound - WD begs to differ - from wdc.com/products/internal-storage/wd-black-desktop.html "The WD Black drive featurs a dual-core processor that offers twice the processing capacity as a standard single-core processor to maximize drive performance". Also, I think WE does not make a secret of the information I'm asking, but they don't make it particularly clear either.
Oct 30, 2017 at 21:17 history asked davidgo CC BY-SA 3.0