Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 1
    Is this monitor really necessary? Windows has always been able to alert a user to the fact a "hi-speed" (USB 2.0) device is plugged into a 1.0 port. Is it unable to do so for USB 3.0? Commented Oct 20, 2017 at 13:09
  • @TwistyImpersonator: I'm quite sure it's not necessary. I found many testimonies of people who disabled it with no problem. I only found one which said that without it the mouse was less precise, but which I find hard to believe.
    – harrymc
    Commented Oct 20, 2017 at 13:41
  • I follow the "not required like a driver would be" argument...but does one forgo all notification that a device is in the wrong port with this monitor? Commented Oct 20, 2017 at 13:51
  • 2
    Your link explains about Renesas Electronics' "USB3.0 Monitor application (rusb3mon.exe/dll)", not about Intel's "iusb3mon". One can only guess they serve the same exact goal, but that's all, a wild guess. Commented Oct 21, 2017 at 20:15
  • 3
    @ThatBrazilianGuy: The Renesas implementation files have the same names as the Intel ones, just with the first "i" replaced, so the two products seem to have a parallel architecture. So I do agree, this is a guess, but there are some facts behind. It would be logical for Renesas to base its implementation on Intel's.
    – harrymc
    Commented Oct 21, 2017 at 20:28