Timeline for A gigabit network interface is CPU-limited to 25MB/s. How can I maximize the throughput?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 at 13:06 | vote | accept | netvope | ||
| Mar 28, 2010 at 3:28 | answer | added | Eric | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 10:26 | answer | added | geek | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 7:46 | answer | added | L. Cornelius Dol | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 18:44 | comment | added | MacLemon | Jumbo frames definitely require both ends (aka computer and switch) to support this. I doubt you can increase the throughput on this hardware. I guess you would need to swap the ethernet phy for a better one (e.g. with hardare checksumming) which is unlikely to be possible on this hardware. (Likely to be an onboard soldered ethernet chip rather than a pci module.) | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:17 | comment | added | netvope | Thanks, I'll try. I did that Windows with no effects, but now I realize I didn't turn it on on the other computers. I guess jumbo frame probably requires support from both ends to work. | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:14 | history | edited | netvope | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 116 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:09 | comment | added | Chris W. Rea | Suggestion: Perhaps enabling jumbo frames would reduce the overhead and increase throughput. superuser.com/questions/95546/… | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:00 | history | edited | netvope | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Mar 26, 2010 at 12:50 | history | edited | netvope | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 242 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2010 at 12:42 | history | asked | netvope | CC BY-SA 2.5 |