Timeline for MAC Address NAT-ing is it possible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 | history | edited | Burgi |
Removed obsolete tag
|
|
| Sep 13, 2016 at 4:15 | vote | accept | Nicolas Racine | ||
| Sep 9, 2016 at 11:55 | comment | added | Nicolas Racine |
@Argonauts All of my routing was okay, All router had the same gateway 10.0.0.1 I figured what was going on actually and posted it if your interested. Also i know there is only one route and that a bridge or not, would have been the same thing. But I was saying that because if i just would have put ether1 of router 1 bridged with all router modem arp brodcast would have made everything work ( since the modem would of had receive mac of all router) but would also have made all traffic on router1 go all the way to air even if its dst to internet.
|
|
| Sep 9, 2016 at 11:31 | answer | added | Nicolas Racine | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 11:34 | comment | added | Argonauts | What are the subnet and default gateway settings for each of the 3 routers - 10.0.0.1, .2 and .3? The issue of if and/or where you could use an arp proxy for routing purposes is dependent on that answer. Also with the topology in your drawing, the path that normal traffic takes is always the same ( bridged or routed). In other words while you can certainly control the ability to route between the various LAN segments ( eg each of your NAT networks), functionally all traffic to/from the internet must go through eth1. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 11:33 | comment | added | Benoit PHILIPPON | I'm not sure what you want to acheive, but RouterOs has some firewalling commands at MAC level; check the bridge menu, filters and NAT tabs. You can do stuff like MAC dst-nat / src-nat here, and it works nice. | |
| S Sep 7, 2016 at 19:37 | history | suggested | creidhne | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improve grammar, spelling and brevity
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 19:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 7, 2016 at 19:37 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2016 at 18:15 | comment | added | Nicolas Racine | @Argonauts I think I actually need arp proxying though. Cause like i said If I ping from an external source the public ip configured at my friend for example it will never show up on wireshark on my frist router, And then if I put my friend public ip on the Eht1 of my first router I start receiving the request since my router actually answered the arp request the modem sent. Its like the modem don't route the traffic, til there is an ip to the connected interface. | |
| Sep 7, 2016 at 18:07 | comment | added | Argonauts | The microtik router could have ARP broadcasting disabled. See this link for configuration details wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/ARP In your configuration as shown you shouldn't need arp proxying; assuming the routers are configured with the correct subnet. | |
| Sep 7, 2016 at 18:01 | history | edited | Nicolas Racine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 145 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 7, 2016 at 17:51 | history | asked | Nicolas Racine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |