Timeline for Static routes and multiple routers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2016 at 5:51 | comment | added | Julie Pelletier |
I'm not 100% sure, but I think that a tracert 172.27.71.1 and tracert 172.27.72.1 from the same machine on your side might give you a better answer.
|
|
| May 14, 2016 at 5:47 | comment | added | James | I'm not asking why I need the VLAN, I'm asking why the static route is necessary. | |
| May 14, 2016 at 5:46 | comment | added | Julie Pelletier | I can't explain why you need the 172.27.0.0/16 VLAN. That's your infrastructure design. | |
| May 14, 2016 at 5:44 | comment | added | James | 172.27.0.0/16 is a subnet I use inside my network, my friend only uses 192.168.20.X If my router is NATing the outbound traffic then shouldn't my friends network never see any 172.27.0.0/16 addresses as my NAT will always rewrite them first? | |
| May 14, 2016 at 3:50 | comment | added | James | Thanks for your reply. With respect to question #1 if my router is NATing the outbound traffic, then in what situation does a packet ever arrive at my friends router with a 172.27.0.0/16 address as either the source or destination? | |
| May 14, 2016 at 3:37 | history | answered | Julie Pelletier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |