Timeline for ReFS combination with storage spaces and TrueCrypt
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2016 at 15:57 | comment | added | wwhite | Yes, but afaik using storage spaces changes the features of ReFS. Still, those two questions ( * ) and ( ** ) are, what I am concerned about. | |
| May 10, 2016 at 15:47 | comment | added | Ramhound | Storage Spaces is still software-ish RAID feature. What file system you use won't change the features of Storage Spaces | |
| May 10, 2016 at 15:44 | comment | added | wwhite | Thanks, but I think your statement is only true in combination with NTFS. "To combat bit rot, ReFS (again, when combined with Storage Spaces) uses its "scrubbing" feature to read all copies of a file in the array and compare their metadata with one another. If a corrupted file is found anywhere in the array, it is replaced by a good copy" link | |
| May 10, 2016 at 15:36 | comment | added | Ramhound | Storage Spaces is RAID, there are several options, none of them will repair bit rot but one will make it irrelevant due to parity and mirroring | |
| May 10, 2016 at 15:29 | review | First posts | |||
| May 11, 2016 at 18:30 | |||||
| May 10, 2016 at 15:29 | history | asked | wwhite | CC BY-SA 3.0 |