Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • Would this actually work as a Sandbox?
    – Ivo Flipse
    Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 10:29
  • What do you mean by "safety net"? And, are you aware of so called live versions?
    – Tim Büthe
    Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 10:50
  • Why are you against the vm approach, it works fantastically in seamless mode. Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 11:01
  • 2
    @Tim, Many people would argue that calling Windows a "safety net" is not very wise. I just mean people trying Linux for the first time would probably feel happier being able to immediately go back to Windows for specific tasks that they don;t yet know how to achieve in Linux.
    – Ash
    Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 12:08
  • @Sam, I'm not against it, I have just heard that there are lighter weight ways to run Linux within Windows that don;t need full virtualisation. I also own a netbook that has plenty of RAM but an Atom processor, so a lighter way to run Linux would be better.
    – Ash
    Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 12:10