Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Nov;25(11):3328-37.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

Daniëlle van der Waal  1 , Marleen J Emaus  2 , Marije F Bakker  2 , Gerard J den Heeten  3   4 , Nico Karssemeijer  5 , Ruud M Pijnappel  3   6 , Wouter B Veldhuis  6 , André L M Verbeek  7 , Carla H van Gils  2 , Mireille J M Broeders  7   3
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands

Daniëlle van der Waal et al. Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Differences in breast density between populations may explain part of the variation in regional breast cancer screening performance. This study aimed to determine whether regional differences in breast density distribution are present in the Dutch screening population.

Methods: As part of the DENSE trial, mammographic density was measured using a fully-automated volumetric method. The regions in our study were based on the geographic coverage of 14 reading units representing a large part of the Netherlands. General linear models were used.

Results: Four hundred eighty-five thousand and twenty-one screening participants with a median age of 60 years were included (2013-2014). The proportion of women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts ranged from 32.5% to 45.7% between regions. Mean percent dense volume varied between 6.51% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.46-6.55) and 7.68% (95% CI: 7.66-7.71). Age differences could not explain the variation. Socio-economic status (SES) was positively associated with volumetric density in all analyses (low SES: 6.95% vs. high SES: 7.63%; p trend < 0.0001), whereas a potential association between urbanisation and breast density only became apparent after SES adjustment.

Conclusion: There appears to be geographic variation in mammographic density in the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of including breast density as parameter in the evaluation of screening performance.

Key points: • Mammographic density may affect regional breast cancer screening performance. • Volumetric breast density varies across screening areas. • SES is positively associated with breast density. • Implications of volumetric breast density differences need to be studied further.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Digital mammography; Mammographic density; Socio-economic status; Urbanisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age-adjusted geometric means of the percent dense volume across the Netherlands
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K. The mammogram that cried Wolfe. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:297–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159–1169. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB) National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands, 1990-2007. Rotterdam: NETB; 2009.
    1. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB) National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 1990–2011/2012. Rotterdam: NETB; 2014.