Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates
- PMID: 20407901
- PMCID: PMC2914257
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1786-7
Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the referral pattern after the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
Methods: Preceding the nationwide digitalisation of the Dutch screening programme, an FFDM feasibility study was conducted. Detection and referral rates for FFDM and screen-film mammography (SFM) were compared for first and subsequent screens. Furthermore, radiological characteristics of referrals in digital screening were assessed.
Results: A total of 312,414 screening mammograms were performed (43,913 digital and 268,501 conventional), with 4,473 consecutive referrals (966 following FFDM). Initially the FFDM referral rate peaked, and many false-positive results were noted as a consequence of pseudolesions and increased detection of (benign) microcalcifications. A higher overall referral rate was observed in FFDM screening in both first and subsequent examinations (p < .001), with a significant increase in cancer detection (p = .010).
Conclusion: As a result of initial inexperience with digital screening images implementing FFDM in a population-based breast cancer screening programme may lead to a strong, but temporary increase in referral. Dedicated training in digital screening for radiographers and screening radiologists is therefore recommended. Referral rates decrease and stabilise (learning curve effect) at a higher level than in conventional screening, yet with significantly enhanced cancer detection.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2914257/bin/330_2010_1786_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2914257/bin/330_2010_1786_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2914257/bin/330_2010_1786_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2914257/bin/330_2010_1786_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jun;84(6):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 14. Eur J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25816990 Review.
-
Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1010-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2157. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19770323
-
Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):353-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532090225. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19703851
-
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):347-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081235. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19401569 Review.
-
Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.Acta Radiol. 2005 Nov;46(7):679-89. doi: 10.1080/02841850500223547. Acta Radiol. 2005. PMID: 16372686
Cited by
-
Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jan 4;113(1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa080. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 32572492 Free PMC article.
-
Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002-2016).BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6230-z. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31660890 Free PMC article.
-
Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 5;18(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4122-2. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29506487 Free PMC article.
-
Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.BMC Cancer. 2017 May 5;17(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3294-5. BMC Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28476109 Free PMC article.
-
Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3810-3819. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4757-4. Epub 2017 Mar 13. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28289944
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials