Monitoring of smoking-induced emphysema with CT in a lung cancer screening setting: detection of real increase in extent of emphysema
- PMID: 17709835
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443061330
Monitoring of smoking-induced emphysema with CT in a lung cancer screening setting: detection of real increase in extent of emphysema
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively establish the minimum increase in emphysema score (ES) required for detection of real increased extent of emphysema with 95% confidence by using multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in a lung cancer screening setting.
Materials and methods: The study was a substudy of the NELSON project that was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health and the ethics committee of each participating hospital, with patient informed consent. For this substudy, original approval and informed consent allowed use of data for future research. Among 1684 men screened with low-dose multi-detector row CT (30 mAs, 16 detector rows, 0.75-mm section thickness) between April 2004 and March 2005, only participants who underwent repeat multi-detector row CT with the same scanner after 3 months because of an indeterminate pulmonary nodule were included. Extent of emphysema was considered to remain stable in this short period. Extent of low-attenuation areas representing emphysema was computed for repeat and baseline scans as percentage of lung volume below three attenuation threshold values (-910 HU, -930 HU, -950 HU). Limits of agreement were determined with Bland-Altman approach; upper limits were used to deduce the minimum increase in ES required for detecting increased extent of emphysema with 95% probability. Factors influencing the limits of agreement were determined.
Results: In total, 157 men (mean age, 60 years) were included in the study. Limits of agreement for differences in total lung volume between repeat and baseline scans were -13.4% to +12.6% at -910 HU, -4.7% to +4.2% at -930 HU, and -1.3% to +1.1% at -950 HU. Differences in ES showed weak to moderate correlation with variation in level of inspiration (r=0.20-0.49, P<.05). Scanner calibration could be excluded as a factor contributing to variation in ES.
Conclusion: Increase in ES required to detect increased extent of smoking-related emphysema with 95% probability varies between 1.1% of total lung volume at -950 HU and 12.6% at -910 HU for low-dose multi-detector row CT. Clinical trial registration no. ISRCTN63545820.
Copyright (c) RSNA, 2007.
Comment in
-
Can the extent of low-attenuation areas on CT scans really demonstrate changes in the severity of emphysema?Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):293-4; author reply 294. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471071608. Radiology. 2008. PMID: 18372475 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Lung Cancer: Incidental Pulmonary Parenchymal Findings.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):503-513. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19003. Epub 2017 Dec 12. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29231759 Review.
-
Distribution of emphysema in heavy smokers: impact on pulmonary function.Respir Med. 2010 Jan;104(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 6. Respir Med. 2010. PMID: 19734030 Clinical Trial.
-
Smoking-related emphysema and interstitial lung diseases.J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Aug;22(3):286-91. doi: 10.1097/01.rti.0000213585.06602.08. J Thorac Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17721346 Review.
-
Emphysema detected by lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence, and correlation with smoking habits and pulmonary function in Japanese male subjects.Respirology. 2006 Mar;11(2):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00827.x. Respirology. 2006. PMID: 16548907
-
Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):1036-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382042196. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16424242
Cited by
-
Repeatability of Pulmonary Quantitative Computed Tomography Measurements in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 15;208(6):657-665. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1698PP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37490608 No abstract available.
-
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35921047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implementation planning for lung cancer screening in China.Precis Clin Med. 2019 Mar;2(1):13-44. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbz002. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Precis Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 35694700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021 Apr 22;3(2):e200503. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200503. eCollection 2021 Apr. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33969308 Free PMC article.
-
Emphysema quantification using low-dose computed tomography with deep learning-based kernel conversion comparison.Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6779-6787. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07020-3. Epub 2020 Jun 29. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32601950
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous