Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside
- PMID: 14573447
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811415
Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate how ambient light and interactive adjustment of density and contrast affect the detection of catheter fragments when interpreting bedside chest radiographs on soft-copy displays.
Materials and methods: A total of 131 catheter fragments were superimposed over 10 bedside chest radiographs obtained with storage phosphor technology. Images were displayed on a clinical intensive care unit viewing station (color cathode-ray tube monitor, 21 inch [53 cm], 1280 x 1024 matrix) and were independently evaluated by five radiologists. The number of catheter fragments per image varied between 12 and 14, with an approximately equal distribution in high- and low-absorption areas. Detectability of catheter fragments was assessed under subdued and bright ambient light conditions with and without interactive adjustment of window width and level.
Results: Under subdued light, the detection rate of catheter fragments was significantly higher than under bright light (51.8% vs 56.6%, p < 0.05). Interactive window setting adjustment significantly increased the detection rate from 52.5% to 60.8% (p < 0.05) under subdued light and from 47.9% to 55.6% (p < 0.05) under bright light. With adjustment of window settings, the difference between the detection rates under subdued light (60.8%) and under bright light (55.6%) did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion: Detection of catheters on soft-copy display is significantly decreased by bright ambient light, an effect that can be largely compensated for by means of interactive adjustment of window settings.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.Eur J Radiol. 2008 Apr;66(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 Aug 6. Eur J Radiol. 2008. PMID: 17689217
-
Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.Invest Radiol. 2005 Mar;40(3):180-5. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000153658.15272.91. Invest Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15714093
-
Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):611-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342031297. Epub 2004 Dec 15. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15601893
-
Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):762-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2323030628. Epub 2004 Jul 23. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15273338
-
Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):216-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2271020045. Radiology. 2003. PMID: 12668747 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Breast screen new South wales generally demonstrates good radiologic viewing conditions.J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):759-67. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9571-1. J Digit Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23319112 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources