Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2010 at 11:28 comment added KarstenF Using colour might complicate things, because you would need to support different forms of colour-blindness. Otherwise this sounds pretty good.
Apr 19, 2010 at 16:25 history edited Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 2.5
Minor edit: grammar/spelling/case/punctuation/etc.
Jul 6, 2009 at 14:19 comment added pbreitenbach None of these ideas offer much more protection than "Type in this word: STACK". If that's all you need, then fine. But don't fool yourselves into thinking that these approaches offer more protection.
Mar 5, 2009 at 7:24 comment added Nivas For "there can be different answers for the math question": allow all possible answers - all we need is to prove that the user is human. Not a math whiz kid. (Anyway, I am not for match approach completely - if google can, every body can solve them. by sending a request to google.com :-)
Jan 21, 2009 at 7:45 comment added Shalom Craimer Excellent idea! Perhaps even by playing with changing foreground/background colors, you can get something that displays text easily visible to humans, but too random for bots? Of course this is harder on color-blind people :-(
Dec 23, 2008 at 2:54 comment added BobbyShaftoe This would not be good for users with acalcula. There are scientists with this affliction so it isn't unreasonable that there could be programmers with it.
Oct 29, 2008 at 1:48 comment added alex That example above 'ssdfatwerweajhcsadkoghvefdhrffghlfgdhowfgh' could be solved by a simple regex
Sep 23, 2008 at 0:13 comment added An̲̳̳drew I like this one - for example "please enter the word spelled by the third underlined red letter, fourth bold green letter, and fifth non-bold blue letter".
Aug 12, 2008 at 10:55 history edited Jarod Elliott CC BY-SA 2.5
Aug 12, 2008 at 5:11 history answered Jarod Elliott CC BY-SA 2.5