Timeline for Girl, you're a mess: [images] needs a makeover
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24 at 16:52 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | Hey folks, I've removed [status-planned] from this post. It looks like there might still be work to do here, and I'd encourage you to follow through with it. If staff assistance is required, please help us out by making it clear what we should do, then flagging the post to be retagged [status-review]. | |
| Jun 24 at 16:52 | history | edited | SlateStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 11:26 | comment | added | user648246 | This is still happening, only a couple days ago someone asked a question with this tag. | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 19:25 | vote | accept | Excellll | ||
| Mar 24, 2015 at 4:08 | history | edited | Sathyajith BhatMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | Cole Tobin | @Excellll not the best, but it's much better | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 18:28 | comment | added | Excellll | Is the new title witty enough? | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 18:21 | history | edited | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
wittified title
|
| Feb 24, 2015 at 23:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/570367058526892034 | ||
| Feb 24, 2015 at 16:08 | comment | added | akostadinov | @scott, ah, didn't know what witty mean and didn't see your smiley :) given your examples now I can fully agree with you, it's a loss | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 15:10 | comment | added | Cole Tobin | @akostadinov No. Witty titles are a must. See: plugins, skipping, utilization, columns, dual-core/quad-core/multi-core, etc. | |
| Feb 23, 2015 at 23:59 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 17 | |
| Feb 23, 2015 at 7:36 | comment | added | akostadinov |
@Scott, to me original title "Plea to disambiguate [images]" makes alot more sense. Although the word tag in it would have helped even more.
|
|
| Feb 21, 2015 at 9:33 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | -1 for not writing a witty question title: you could have said something like "Let's bring [images] into focus". :-) | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 21:56 | comment | added | Kevin Panko | Leaving it there would simply allow the problem to come back in time. There are alternatives such as image-editing or vector-graphics which have more clear meanings. | |
| Feb 19, 2015 at 20:44 | history | asked | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |