Timeline for Get to the core of [dual-core], [quad-core], and [multi-core]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2014 at 13:50 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | I find having a tag that recognizes the multi-core aspect of CPUs useful vs. having only the [cpu] tag. But I'd go for "one [multi-core] tag to rule them all"! | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 21:44 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @Robotnik Maybe, but nothing's official yet :( | |
| Dec 3, 2014 at 4:55 | comment | added | Robotnik | I'm more on the 'just [cpu]' fence personally | |
| Dec 3, 2014 at 2:07 | history | edited | QuyNguyen2013 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 108 characters in body
|
| Nov 26, 2014 at 17:21 | comment | added | fixer1234 | So what's the final verdict, have [multi-core] plus [cpu] or just [cpu]? | |
| Nov 26, 2014 at 16:25 | history | edited | QuyNguyen2013 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2014 at 9:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/536446249185312768 | ||
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:22 | history | edited | QuyNguyen2013 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:22 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @fixer1234 Yeah... | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:22 | comment | added | fixer1234 | How about this title: Get to the core of [dual-core], [quad=core], and [multi-core] ? | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:20 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | yup. precisely. | |
| Nov 22, 2014 at 21:19 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @JourneymanGeek - I looked through the questions and many deal with issues specific to multi-core processors. Is your point that it isn't necessary to differentiate single vs. multi because simply using [cpu] will attract the right readers? | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:22 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @JourneymanGeek True, but Virtualbox and the likes... | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 23:12 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @JourneymanGeek Synonymizing or changing to CPU maybe? | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 22:02 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | AU contrare, they are non specific, and I don't think there's too many issues specific to multicore systems | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 21:56 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @JourneymanGeek - to what extent are multi-core questions processor-specific? | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 21:19 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'd think even multicore is very meta. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 21:08 | comment | added | fixer1234 | @allquixotic - So it is agreed? We will add the [special-snowflake] tag? | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:50 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @allquixotic I know... I said lol | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | allquixotic | I was kidding. :) | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | QuyNguyen2013 | @allquixotic Lol, but that just adds another tag for people to choose from. If you can only use two cores, it is probably a software problem :) | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:48 | comment | added | allquixotic | But I only have problems specifically with TWO cores! When I use fewer or more, everything works fine! I'm such a special snowflake! :( Why won't you let me be a special snowflake, fixer1234? | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:37 | comment | added | fixer1234 | Yes, but quad core has twice as many cores as dual core. And what about hex core. I suppose you want to merge that in, too? :-) Good idea. | |
| Nov 21, 2014 at 18:17 | history | asked | QuyNguyen2013 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |