Timeline for Time to downgrade [upgrade]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 24 at 16:51 | history | edited | SlateStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 24 at 16:51 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | Hey folks, I've removed [status-planned] from this post. It looks like there might still be work to do here, and I'd encourage you to follow through with it. If staff assistance is required, please help us out by making it clear what we should do, then flagging the post to be retagged [status-review]. | |
Oct 23, 2014 at 8:27 | history | edited | Oliver Salzburg |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 13, 2014 at 22:18 | answer | added | fixer1234 | timeline score: -2 | |
Oct 13, 2014 at 19:36 | comment | added | Excellll | @fixer1234 I really don't think [ubuntu-upgrade] provides anything more useful than [ubuntu] by itself. Or [memory-upgrade] and its ilk. You should totally write up an answer and give your defense/proposal though so we can get more community response. | |
Oct 13, 2014 at 18:23 | comment | added | fixer1234 | An Upgrade tag is useful information. There is a common set of questions/issues that deal specifically with upgrades, and the experience/expertise doesn't necessarily lie with the same people who might be the experts on how to use the features. If nothing else, it is a heads up as to the nature of the question for someone who either does or doesn't want to answer upgrade questions. The issue raised in your question was insufficient specificity. That doesn't make it worthless and the answer would seem to be to break it into more specific tags. Discard:Keep:Subdivide = bad:good:better. | |
Oct 13, 2014 at 18:00 | comment | added | Excellll | @fixer1234 No, I'm suggesting that we do away with the tag and just remove it from all questions without replacement. Questions about upgrading should be tagged with the appropriate tag for whatever is being upgraded, whether it's memory or an OS. Those tags provide all the information and classification that is needed to help the right people find these questions. | |
Oct 13, 2014 at 4:13 | comment | added | fixer1234 | How would questions about upgrades in any sense be differentiated from questions that have nothing to do with upgrades? Are you proposing to replace it with several tags that are more specific? | |
Oct 4, 2014 at 6:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/518292781832237058 | ||
Oct 1, 2014 at 0:42 | comment | added | Robotnik | Agreed for the same reasons as the update tag, It should just be burned outright :) | |
Sep 30, 2014 at 21:59 | history | asked | Excellll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |