Timeline for Can we please have better tag wiki excerpts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 at 13:24 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Relevant: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/624/alignment-of-excel-tags | |
| Jun 26, 2011 at 21:20 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 174 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2011 at 21:04 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 176 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2011 at 13:02 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | To further outline an 4g example, does "This tag contains questions about 4g." help you further? No. Does "Questions about 3g be tagged 3g." help you further? No. Will I read that "Questions about 3g be tagged 3g." when I'm asking a new question? No. Will I consult all tags that I use in advance? No. So, where are the tag page lists really used for? To serve as a wikis to learn what the tags are about, not for useless trivial meta information that nobody will ever read when they use it... | |
| Jun 26, 2011 at 2:44 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2011 at 2:31 | history | edited | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 480 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2011 at 1:52 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | That sounds painfully meta. They are not meta objects, but they are tags. So, tag wikis are content about the object which the tag is referring to. Take for example an Excel tag, the tag wiki should thus be content about Excel and thus not contain instructions about tags that will not be read anyway. Tag Wikis don't suddenly elevate to being Meta just because a Tag is something Meta, or in programmer's term: A pointer to an object... | |
| Jun 25, 2011 at 19:29 | history | answered | Lance Roberts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |