49

A question I flippantly answered a while ago literally blew up today, gaining me a Skeetian amount of rep for a single question in a single day.

Is there a way to determine why this happened? I immediately wondered who was referring clickers to this question, but is that even possible? Or is there another way*?

* Goog'd but didn't see anything

Improve this question
6
  • I've wanted this for a long time - I wouldn't be surprised if I've mentioned it before here, but I'm glad that this is finally an official feature request
    – Kyle Cronin
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 2:09
  • 1
    Funny, I was looking at the same question, but this is hardly the first time I've seen similar events. Once Scott Hanselman linked to a post in a tweet and it pulled in something like 30 new votes. It was sheer luck then that I figured out where they came from.
    – Joel Coehoorn
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 2:38
  • 4
    The answer in this specific case, by the way, is reddit.
    – Charles
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 6:18
  • @Charles: Thanks. Thought it probably would be something like this.\
    – user1228
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 11:11
  • 2
    Fwiw, I think this would be an awesome feature to give to 20Kers (or 30Kers, to give the gamers something else to work for).
    – George Stocker
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 12:49
  • Related: meta.stackexchange.com/a/258814/163135
    – Chris
    Commented Oct 19, 2015 at 22:22

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
24

I hear you: just today I had four upvotes to an answer I wrote over a year ago, and it would be awesome to have a way to find where the traffic driving those votes and others like them is coming from. I had just finished my own (now-deleted) feature-request and someone pointed me here (odd that your question didn't show in a search on "referrer").

Here are some additional thoughts:

To prevent referrer spam, this information should only be shown via an ajax request (those specifically asking for it) and only available to those with at least a certain amount of rep. If you want to get fancy, more rep could give you the right to see more history, though that is hardly necessary.

I also considered filtering the stored information: perhaps not showing/saving referrers from within the SE network or Google, but after some thought I think it's better to be able to also see Google searches leading to a question and to preserve the chain within the network if other questions are pointing to this one. Another rejected idea is that this could only be shown to those with a vested interest (ie: post) in a specific question, but that would end up encouraging wrong behaviors (junk posts just to get referrers).

To be useful, you would want to at minimum be able to see a list of referrers today so that you can perhaps find and interact with whatever source is driving this traffic while it's still relevant. Additionally, all links into a question page (including direct answer links) should be aggregated together and any significant referrer should be available (even if it's a little stale), where significant is defined as has driven at least some number of views to the question.

Improve this answer
2
  • So is there such a "referrer" feature? I was thinking that another use for that is to comb that information and create libraries of features that have answers on the site(s)
    – Георги Кременлиев
    Commented Apr 15, 2014 at 9:27
  • 1
    There is an analytics page that shows some of this information, but it's only available to moderators.
    – Joel Coehoorn
    Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 15:43
6

The same thing happened to me a while back; it was due to an "interesting stuff on SO from last month" sort of blog post linking to the answer, but I was mystified at first because Google didn't pick up the blog entry for a while. Eventually I got curious, tried again, found the entry, allowing me to both satisfy my curiosity and thank the blogger. :]

So if you wait a few days and try again you might be able to turn up the source on Google.

Improve this answer
2
  • Sam Saffron is waffles, the SE developer. Just in case you hadn't realised ;)
    – Mark Henderson
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 6:14
  • @Farseeker: Aha! Ok, thanks. I knew he worked for SE, but not what his display name on Meta was.
    – McCannot
    Commented Jul 20, 2011 at 12:39

You must log in to answer this question.