Timeline for To spoiler or not to spoiler, June 2014 edition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 21, 2014 at 8:10 | comment | added | user56 | I've always been on the other side of the spectrum for spoilers. But I do feel that “this character” is only a small step removed from the “silly things” that should be avoided. | |
| Jun 19, 2014 at 19:46 | comment | added | alexwlchan | This answer seems to be the consensus, so I’m accepting it and we can leave the controversial question unmodified. | |
| Jun 19, 2014 at 19:45 | vote | accept | alexwlchan | ||
| Jun 16, 2014 at 19:00 | comment | added | Bobson | A question: At what point is a spoiler no longer worth protecting? Would a question about the end of LotR be problematic? The Wrath of Khan? Episode IV? Episode III? All the above? | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 7:21 | comment | added | Avner Shahar-Kashtan | I agree with you that the current spoiler policy, the fairly consensually upvoted answer by Tony Meyer you linked to and quote from, seems even more appropriate considering HNQ. I don't see how anything has changed, and don't see a need to reexamine the policy. | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 4:40 | comment | added | Izkata | This spoiler is relatively minor (and years older) compared to many of the others, that might be why it's become such an issue - which is why I brought up the other question in the comments | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 2:46 | history | edited | user1027 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Jun 15, 2014 at 20:57 | history | answered | user1027 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |