Timeline for Add "SE is not a social networking site" to the list of what-site-is-not in the FAQ
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 14, 2010 at 15:56 | comment | added | user1119 | @Kaestur Hakarl: I think the chat room will take off after there is enough traffic on the site. Right now there are simply not enough active users. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 15:44 | comment | added | Larry Wang | @George: Actually, math.se already has a chat room, it was simply used once and nobody ever came back. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 15:39 | comment | added | user1119 | @97832123 : Here we can even follow up our comments by looking at "responses", which is great. If what is bothering you is the lack of capability for discussion, maybe the stackoverflow chat announcement will warm your heart: blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/08/chat-now-in-public-beta ... I believe every stackexchange site will obtain it eventually. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 14:36 | comment | added | 97832123 | @George S.: Because the meta site here is an SE site, it's cumbersome and annoying to use... | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 10:11 | comment | added | user1119 | Since the meta site here is based on the stackexchange software rather than a traditional discussion forum, flame wars are less likely by design itself. Moreover good and helpful posts would get voted up and rude and nasty posts will get voted down. Upvotes are possible even for comments. Thus there will be immediate feedback. For all these reasons I like the software backend a lot. Still you do have a point; humans are humans and we better cultivate a pleasant atmosphere. | |
Aug 14, 2010 at 7:19 | history | answered | Matt E | CC BY-SA 2.5 |