Timeline for What to do with non-scientific or pseudo-scientific answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.earthscience.stackexchange.com/ with https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 28, 2015 at 4:17 | comment | added | Donald.McLean | For the most part, the pseudo science answers have mostly been short and filled with gibberish (and would probably be deleted via the low quality/not an answer review queue). Otherwise, I'm happy to let the community standard apply - if the community would just give me a standard that I could apply. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 10:32 | vote | accept | Mitch Goshorn | ||
| Feb 17, 2015 at 0:23 | history | answered | HDE 226868Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |