Timeline for A question about large cardinal axioms.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2011 at 17:09 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| S May 3, 2011 at 14:58 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| May 3, 2011 at 17:09 | |||||
| May 3, 2011 at 14:58 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| S May 3, 2011 at 14:58 | |||||
| May 3, 2011 at 0:23 | answer | added | Andreas Blass | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 2, 2011 at 20:39 | answer | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 2, 2011 at 20:18 | comment | added | user5810 | It's not just the edit history that would need to be looked at, it's the source of the original post. | |
| May 2, 2011 at 20:11 | comment | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | I looked at what was written and fixed the typo (a $\lt$ sign). You can see this by looking at the edit history. | |
| May 2, 2011 at 20:07 | comment | added | user5810 | @Andres: I suppose that would be an interesting question, but how did you get that from what Garabed wrote? | |
| May 2, 2011 at 20:04 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2011 at 20:02 | history | asked | Garabed Gulbenkian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |